Current:Home > InvestIndia’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status -VisionFunds
India’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status
View
Date:2025-04-13 00:56:42
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — India’s top court on Monday upheld a 2019 decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to strip disputed Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as a semi-autonomous region with a separate constitution and inherited protections on land and jobs.
The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the region’s special status had been a “temporary provision” and that removing it in 2019 was constitutionally valid.
The unprecedented move also divided the region into two federal territories, Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, both ruled directly by the central government without a legislature of their own. As a result, the Muslim-majority region is now run by unelected government officials and has lost its flag, criminal code and constitution.
But Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said the government has promised to restore Jammu-Kashmir’s statehood and should do so as soon as possible. Ladakh, however, will remain a federal territory.
He also ordered the country’s election commission to hold local legislative polls in the region by next Sept. 30.
The ruling is expected to boost the electoral prospects of Modi’s governing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in national polls next year. The 2019 move resonated in much of India, where the Modi government was cheered by supporters for fulfilling a long-held Hindu nationalist pledge to scrap the Muslim-majority region’s special status.
But the judgment will disappoint many in Kashmir, including the region’s main pro-India Kashmiri politicians who had petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse the deeply unpopular decision, which was imposed under an unprecedented security and communication clampdown that lasted many months.
The court’s hearings began in August and included extensive arguments and discussions on the move’s constitutional validity.
veryGood! (9413)
Related
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Georgia House takes a step toward boosting pay for the state’s judges
- Hamas recruiter tells CBS News that Israel's actions in Gaza are fueling a West Bank recruiting boom
- Co-inventor of Pop-Tarts, William Post, passes away at 96
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Ford CEO says company will rethink where it builds vehicles after last year’s autoworkers strike
- UGG Boots Are on Sale for 53% Off- Platform, Ultra Mini, & More Throughout Presidents’ Day Weekend
- 11 cold-stunned sea turtles returned to Atlantic after rehabilitation in Florida
- Small twin
- John Calipari's middling Kentucky team may be college basketball's most interesting story
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Jury convicts Iowa police chief of lying to feds to acquire machine guns
- Kansas City mom and prominent Hispanic DJ dies in a mass shooting after Chiefs’ victory parade
- Man claims $1 million lottery prize on Valentine's Day, days after break-up, he says
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Ohio woman who disappeared with 5-year-old foster son she may have harmed now faces charges
- Teen Moms Kailyn Lowry Reveals Meaning Behind her Twins' Names
- Man accused of killing deputy makes first court appearance
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Man charged with beheading father carried photos of federal buildings, bomb plans, DA says
Zendaya’s Futuristic Dune: Part Two Premiere Look Has a NSFW Surprise
Louisiana State University running back charged with attempted second-degree murder
Trump's 'stop
Jennifer Lopez Reveals Her Las Vegas Wedding Dress Wasn't From an Old Movie After All
Hilary Duff’s Husband Matthew Koma Shares Hilarious Shoutout to Her Exes for Valentine’s Day
Cleveland-Cliffs to shutter West Virginia tin plant and lay off 900 after tariff ruling